Difference between revisions of "SUNScholar/Audit/Section 11"

From Libopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Since the repository system benefits greatly, from free community contributions of software and documentation, it is fair to ask how institutions using these contributions give back to the communities involved. The more feedback there is to the communities, the more sustainable they become.
+
<center>
 +
'''[[SUNScholar/Audit/Section 12|Section 12]]'''
 +
</center>
  
The institution using community software and documentation can be evaluated for their contributions, by checking to see if they contribute to the following organisations:
+
=SECTION 11 - COMMUNITY=
*http://www.dspace.org
+
#Since the repository system benefits greatly, from free community contributions of software and documentation, it is fair to ask how the institution using these contributions gives back to the communities involved.
*http://www.duraspace.org
+
#'''<font color="red">The more support there is for the communities, the more sustainable they become.</font>'''
*http://www.ubuntu.com
+
#The institution using community software and documentation can be evaluated for their contributions, by checking to see if they contribute to the following organisations:
 +
##http://www.dspace.org
 +
##http://www.duraspace.org
 +
##http://www.ubuntu.com
 +
##http://pkp.sfu.ca
 +
 
 +
Does the institution make individual contributions?
 +
 
 +
Examples are listed below.
 +
*http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/SUNScholar/IR
 +
*http://www.ir-africa.info
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''[[SUNScholar/Audit|Back to Audit]]'''

Latest revision as of 09:07, 21 September 2014

Section 12

SECTION 11 - COMMUNITY

  1. Since the repository system benefits greatly, from free community contributions of software and documentation, it is fair to ask how the institution using these contributions gives back to the communities involved.
  2. The more support there is for the communities, the more sustainable they become.
  3. The institution using community software and documentation can be evaluated for their contributions, by checking to see if they contribute to the following organisations:
    1. http://www.dspace.org
    2. http://www.duraspace.org
    3. http://www.ubuntu.com
    4. http://pkp.sfu.ca

Does the institution make individual contributions?

Examples are listed below.


Back to Audit