Difference between revisions of "BOAI/Section2"

From Libopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*We should achieve what we can when we can.
 
*We should achieve what we can when we can.
 
*We should not delay achieving [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] when we can achieve libre.
 
*We should not delay achieving [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] when we can achieve libre.
 +
'''[[BOAI|Back to INDEX]]'''

Revision as of 18:49, 19 September 2012

Back to INDEX

On licensing and reuse

2.1

  • We recommend CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
  • OA repositories typically depend on permissions from others, such as authors or publishers, and are rarely in a position to require open licenses.
  • However, policy makers in a position to direct deposits into repositories should require open licenses, preferably CC-BY, when they can.
  • OA journals are always in a position to require open licenses, yet most of them do not yet take advantage of the opportunity.
  • We recommend CC-BY for all OA journals.
  • In developing strategy and setting priorities, we recognize that gratis access is better than priced access, libre access is better than gratis access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses.
  • We should achieve what we can when we can.
  • We should not delay achieving gratis in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with gratis when we can achieve libre.
Back to INDEX