Difference between revisions of "SUNScholar/Web Analytics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→References) |
m (→References) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*[[Media:Acrl-meaningful-metrics.pdf|2016 - ACRL - MEANINGFUL METRICS]] | *[[Media:Acrl-meaningful-metrics.pdf|2016 - ACRL - MEANINGFUL METRICS]] | ||
*[[Media:Niso-altmetric-best-practice.pdf|2016 - NISO - ALTMETRICS DATA QUALITY CODE OF CONDUCT]] | *[[Media:Niso-altmetric-best-practice.pdf|2016 - NISO - ALTMETRICS DATA QUALITY CODE OF CONDUCT]] | ||
| + | *[[Media:Sparc-briefing-paper-better-analytics.pdf|2015 - SPARC - BETTER WAYS TO EVALUATE RESEARCH AND RESEARCHERS]] | ||
*[[Media:The-leiden-manifesto.pdf|2015 - NATURE - THE LEIDEN MANIFESTO]] | *[[Media:The-leiden-manifesto.pdf|2015 - NATURE - THE LEIDEN MANIFESTO]] | ||
Revision as of 10:53, 26 February 2016
Back to Customisation
Introduction
It is very important that you ensure that the repository is properly configured so that accurate and authoritative metrics can be accomplished.
The metrics services should be able to reference unique persistent machine-readable identifiers and detailed metadata for openly accessible digital research artifacts in the repository.
Publishing public data in an open, standard, machine-readable format is a best practice.
Research Article Metrics
Repository Website Metrics
References
- https://project-thor.readme.io/docs/introduction-to-persistent-identifiers
- 2016 - ACRL - MEANINGFUL METRICS
- 2016 - NISO - ALTMETRICS DATA QUALITY CODE OF CONDUCT
- 2015 - SPARC - BETTER WAYS TO EVALUATE RESEARCH AND RESEARCHERS
- 2015 - NATURE - THE LEIDEN MANIFESTO
Research
Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
