Difference between revisions of "SUNScholar/Audit/Section 11"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since the repository system benefits greatly, from free community contributions of software and documentation, it is fair to ask how institutions using these contributions give back to the communities involved. The more feedback there is to the communities, the more sustainable they become. | Since the repository system benefits greatly, from free community contributions of software and documentation, it is fair to ask how institutions using these contributions give back to the communities involved. The more feedback there is to the communities, the more sustainable they become. | ||
| − | The institution using community software and documentation can be evaluated for their contributions, by checking to see if they contribute to the following | + | The institution using community software and documentation can be evaluated for their contributions, by checking to see if they contribute to the following organisations: |
*http://www.dspace.org | *http://www.dspace.org | ||
*http://www.duraspace.org | *http://www.duraspace.org | ||
*http://www.ubuntu.com | *http://www.ubuntu.com | ||
Revision as of 15:01, 9 October 2012
Since the repository system benefits greatly, from free community contributions of software and documentation, it is fair to ask how institutions using these contributions give back to the communities involved. The more feedback there is to the communities, the more sustainable they become.
The institution using community software and documentation can be evaluated for their contributions, by checking to see if they contribute to the following organisations:
