Difference between revisions of "SUNScholar/Web Analytics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (79 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <center> | |
| − | + | '''[[SUNScholar/Customisation|Back to Customisation]]''' | |
| − | + | </center> | |
| + | ==Introduction== | ||
| + | <font color="red">'''It is very important that you ensure that the [[SUNScholar/Clean_URL|repository is properly configured]] so that accurate and authoritative metrics can be accomplished.'''</font> | ||
| − | [ | + | The metrics services should be able to reference unique persistent [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_data machine-readable] identifiers and detailed metadata for [[SUNScholar/Open_Access|openly accessible]] digital research artifacts in the repository. |
| − | + | Publishing public data in an open, standard, machine-readable format is a best practice. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | http://www.webcitation.org | |
| + | |||
| + | ==[[SUNScholar/Research Article Metrics|Research Article Metrics]]== | ||
| + | ==[[SUNScholar/Repository Website Metrics|Repository Website Metrics]]== | ||
| + | ==[[SUNScholar/References|References]]== | ||
| + | *https://project-thor.readme.io/docs/introduction-to-persistent-identifiers | ||
| + | *[[Media:Acrl-meaningful-metrics.pdf|2016 - ACRL - MEANINGFUL METRICS]] | ||
| + | *[[Media:Niso-altmetric-best-practice.pdf|2016 - NISO - ALTMETRICS DATA QUALITY CODE OF CONDUCT]] | ||
| + | *[[Media:Sparc-briefing-paper-better-analytics.pdf|2015 - SPARC - BETTER WAYS TO EVALUATE RESEARCH AND RESEARCHERS]] | ||
| − | + | ==Research Metrics Research== | |
| + | ===Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology=== | ||
| + | *http://sun025.sun.ac.za/portal/page/portal/Arts/CREST | ||
| − | + | ==Research Assessment Revision== | |
| + | *[[Media:The-leiden-manifesto.pdf|2015 - NATURE - THE LEIDEN MANIFESTO]] | ||
| + | ===San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)=== | ||
| + | *http://www.ascb.org/dora | ||
| + | [[File:Dora-poster.png|555px]] | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| + | [[Category:Customisation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:28, 23 December 2016
Back to Customisation
Introduction
It is very important that you ensure that the repository is properly configured so that accurate and authoritative metrics can be accomplished.
The metrics services should be able to reference unique persistent machine-readable identifiers and detailed metadata for openly accessible digital research artifacts in the repository.
Publishing public data in an open, standard, machine-readable format is a best practice.
http://www.webcitation.org
Research Article Metrics
Repository Website Metrics
References
- https://project-thor.readme.io/docs/introduction-to-persistent-identifiers
- 2016 - ACRL - MEANINGFUL METRICS
- 2016 - NISO - ALTMETRICS DATA QUALITY CODE OF CONDUCT
- 2015 - SPARC - BETTER WAYS TO EVALUATE RESEARCH AND RESEARCHERS
Research Metrics Research
Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology
Research Assessment Revision
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
