Difference between revisions of "SUNScholar/Capacity Building"
m |
m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''This is the core of the much bigger strategic objectives of (a) [[SUNScholar/Repository Preservation|repository preservation]] and (b) [[SUNScholar/Self-Hosting_Value_Proposition| the self-hosting value proposition]].</font>''' | '''This is the core of the much bigger strategic objectives of (a) [[SUNScholar/Repository Preservation|repository preservation]] and (b) [[SUNScholar/Self-Hosting_Value_Proposition| the self-hosting value proposition]].</font>''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''<big>[[SUNScholar/Capacity Building/Digital Repository Systems Management|TECHNICAL]]</big>''' | '''<big>[[SUNScholar/Capacity Building/Digital Repository Systems Management|TECHNICAL]]</big>''' | ||
| Line 20: | Line 18: | ||
'''<span style="color:#76273c">Simplicity is hard to build, easy to use, and hard to charge for.<br>Complexity is easy to build, hard to use, and easy to charge for.</span>''' | '''<span style="color:#76273c">Simplicity is hard to build, easy to use, and hard to charge for.<br>Complexity is easy to build, hard to use, and easy to charge for.</span>''' | ||
| + | '''[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/give_a_man_a_fish_and_you_feed_him_for_a_day;_teach_a_man_to_fish_and_you_feed_him_for_a_lifetime Give a person a fish and you feed that person for a day.<br>Teach a person to fish and you feed that person for a lifetime.]''' | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Revision as of 20:20, 29 March 2015
Back to Guidelines
The repository content and the repository infrastructure require the following teams, to ensure that the repository is properly maintained, now and in the far future.
This is the core of the much bigger strategic objectives of (a) repository preservation and (b) the self-hosting value proposition.
TECHNICAL
OPERATIONAL
Keep it simple, stupid (KISS)
Simplicity is hard to build, easy to use, and hard to charge for.
Complexity is easy to build, hard to use, and easy to charge for.
Give a person a fish and you feed that person for a day.
Teach a person to fish and you feed that person for a lifetime.
Contents
What is the difference between the operational and technical teams?
Let me try to explain by way of an analogy using something we are very familiar with, namely property development. Property developers buy land prepared with roads and utilities by the local municipality and erect buildings for occupation by future businesses or residents.
In the same way the technical team, prepares "roads and utilities" by constructing a "data center" which houses networking and server equipment. Then the technical team "erects buildings" by installing software on the servers. The software on the servers is utilised by the operational team, the equivalent of "businesses or residents" to complete a specific function. See links below and above for more information about specific functions of the operational team.
What are the functions of these people, with these new job descriptions?
There seems to be some confusion regarding the role and function of the people described in the links above.
Let me try to explain by way an analogy, using the medical services field as an example..
- Hospitals are full of specialists and administrators.
- Each is professionally trained to fulfil a specific task.
- The hospital administrator ensures the smooth functioning of the hospital, for the benefit of the specialists, in order to provide an excellent service to patients.
So it is, with the greatly expanded and currently expanding, technology and information sciences fields, in that, more specialisation is becoming the norm, as it was and is, in the medical field.
And now an attempt to translate the medical services definition to a library services definition, in support of academic research publishing and archiving.
- Academic libraries are full of librarians and directors.
- Each is professionally trained to fulfil a specific task.
- The open scholarship director ensures the smooth functioning of the open academic systems with the assistance of the operational and technical teams, in order to provide an excellent service to researchers.
What else can these teams do for the library and the institution?
These same teams, with their skills, are also then capable of enabling other open systems for the institution, for example:
- An open journal system
- An open conference system
- An open research data management system
- An open research collaboration system
- An open educational resources system
- An open bibliography system
- An open library management system
For more about open services, see: http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/OpenCampus
Communities of Practice (CoP)
In lieu of the lack of professional training venues for open online scholarly publishing practice, it is suggested that communities of practice (CoP) be formed for both the "soft" and "hard" skills mentioned above.
Below is a brief introduction to communities of practice.
Below are some web site examples.
http://www.force11.org http://adlsn.org http://www.itoca.org http://open-access.org.uk http://openaccess.jiscinvolve.org http://is4oa.org http://aoasg.org.au https://www.openaire.eu http://chorusaccess.org http://www.driver-community.eu http://www.medoanet.eu http://www.libereurope.eu/committee/scholarly-research https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/repository-interoperability http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/shared-access-research-ecosystem-share
Scholarly Publishing Links
http://www.journalofelectronicpublishing.org http://www.openaccesspublishing.org http://www.librarypublishing.org http://hybridpublishing.org http://www.pubs-for-dev.info http://www.sparc.arl.org/theme/campus-based-publishing http://www.sspnet.org http://www.aaupnet.org
References
- 2015 - NEYLON - PRINCIPLES OF OPEN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE
- 2015 - ACRL - LIBRARIES AS PUBLISHERS
- 2015 - CRAWFORD - THE ECONOMICS OF OPEN ACCESS
- 2015 - OSI - MAPPING THE FUTURE OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
- 2014 - BREMBS - THE DESOLATE STATE OF OUR SCHOLARLY INFRASTRUCTURE
- 2014 - STEELE - SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION, SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING AND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES
- 2014 - SWAN - NEW APPROACHES IN LIBRARY BASED PUBLISHING
- 2014 - COAR - TASK FORCE: LIBRARIAN COMPETENCIES FOR SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS PUBLISHING
- 2014 - COAR - TOWARD A SEAMLESS GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR REPOSITORIES
- 2014 - SKINNER - LIBRARY-AS-PUBLISHER: CAPACITY BUILDING FOR THE LIBRARY PUBLISHING SUBFIELD
- 2014 - MANGIAFICO - MODELS FOR LIBRARIES IN AN EVOLVING SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING ECOSYSTEM
- 2014 - RAJU - KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS FOR THE DIGITAL ERA ACADEMIC LIBRARY
- 2014 - NISO - OPEN ACCESS INFRASTRUCTURE
- 2014 - MF - DON'T REINVENT THE WHEEL
- 2014 - MF - BUILD ROADS NOT STAGECOACHES
- 2014 - ARL - DEVELOPING DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP SERVICES ON A SHOESTRING BUDGET
- 2014 - LIBRARY PUBLISHING COALITION LAUNCHED
- 2014 - ALIA - FUTURE OF LIBRARIES AS PUBLISHERS
- 2014 - EC - INFRASTRUCTURES FOR OPEN DIGITAL SCIENCE
- 2014 - PRWEB - OPEN STANDARDS AND THE DIGITAL AGE
- 2014 - KN - A SCALABLE AND SUSTAINABLE APPROACH TO OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING
- 2014 - WEF - STATE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REPORT 2014
- 2014 - AKAMI - STATE OF THE INTERNET REPORT
- 2013 - NEYLON - ARCHITECTING THE FUTURE OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS
- 2013 - OSSWATCH - NATIONAL SOFTWARE SURVEY
- 2013 - DLIB - A VISION TOWARDS SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURES
- 2013 - IDRC - CONNECTING ICT TO DEVELOPMENT
- 2013 - MDPI - THE IMPORTANCE OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE AND STANDARDS IN MODERN SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING
- 2013 - AAUPNET - LIBRARY AND UNIVERSITY PRESS COLLABORATION
- 2013 - A4AI - INTERNET AFFORDABILITY REPORT
- 2013 - DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS - SOUTH AFRICA - BROADBAND POLICY
- 2013 - EU - EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA (ERA) PROGRESS REPORT
- 2013 - AAUPNET - LIBRARY AND UNIVERSITY PRESS COLLABORATION
- 2012 - EIFL - IRYNA KUCHMA - 22 STEPS TO AN OPEN ACCESS RESEARCH REPOSITORY
- 2012 - JLSC - SIMMONS - NEW ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: EXAMINING TRAINING NEEDS OF REPOSITORY STAFF
- 2012 - BOAI - ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY
- 2012 - PURDUE UNIVERSITY - STRATEGIES FOR LIBRARY PUBLISHING SUCCESS
- 2011 - PERRY - THE BALANCE POINT
- 2011 - RSP UK - REPOSITORY STAFF AND SKILL SET
- 2011 - LSE - TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE
- 2009 - UMINHO - DRIVER AND COAR - FROM INFRASTRUCTURE TO CONFEDERATION
- 2009 - SPARC - OPEN ACCESS INCOME MODELS - CURRENT PRACTICE