BOAI/Section2 - Revision history

Hgibson at 12:34, 26 September 2012

2012-09-26T12:34:30Z

2012-09-26T12:34:18Z

2012-09-26T12:27:06Z

2012-09-19T16:49:17Z

2012-09-19T10:11:38Z

2012-09-19T10:10:49Z

2.1

2012-09-19T10:09:10Z

2.1

2012-09-19T10:08:21Z

2.1

2012-09-19T10:06:47Z

2.1

2012-09-19T10:06:24Z

2.1

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
   '''[[BOAI|Back to INDEX]]'''
-=Budapest Open Access Initiative - On licensing and reuse==
+==Budapest Open Access Initiative - On licensing and reuse==
 ===2.1===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
   '''[[BOAI|Back to INDEX]]'''
-=Budapest Open Access Initiative - On licensing and reuse=
+=Budapest Open Access Initiative - On licensing and reuse==
 ===2.1===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
   '''[[BOAI|Back to INDEX]]'''
-=On licensing and reuse=
+=Budapest Open Access Initiative - On licensing and reuse=
 ==2.1==
 *We recommend [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 CC-BY] or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
 *OA repositories typically depend on permissions from others, such as authors or publishers, and are rarely in a position to require open licenses.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:49, 19 September 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*We should achieve what we can when we can.		*We should achieve what we can when we can.
	*We should not delay achieving [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] when we can achieve libre.		*We should not delay achieving [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] when we can achieve libre.
		+	'''[[BOAI\|Back to INDEX]]'''

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 *OA journals are always in a position to require open licenses, yet most of them do not yet take advantage of the opportunity.
 *We recommend [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 CC-BY] for all OA journals.
-*In developing strategy and setting priorities, we recognize that gratis access is better than priced access, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre libre] access is better than gratis access, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre libre] under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 CC-BY] or the equivalent is better than [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre libre] under more restrictive open licenses.
+*In developing strategy and setting priorities, we recognize that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] access is better than priced access, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre libre] access is better than gratis access, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre libre] under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 CC-BY] or the equivalent is better than [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre libre] under more restrictive open licenses.
 *We should achieve what we can when we can.
 *We should not delay achieving [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] when we can achieve libre.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *In developing strategy and setting priorities, we recognize that gratis access is better than priced access, libre access is better than gratis access, and libre under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 CC-BY] or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses.
 *We should achieve what we can when we can.
-*We should not delay achieving gratis in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with gratis when we can achieve libre.
+*We should not delay achieving [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis gratis] when we can achieve libre.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 *We recommend CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
 *OA repositories typically depend on permissions from others, such as authors or publishers, and are rarely in a position to require open licenses.
-**However, policy makers in a position to direct deposits into repositories should require open licenses, preferably CC-BY, when they can.
+*'''However, policy makers in a position to direct deposits into repositories should require open licenses, preferably CC-BY, when they can.'''
 *OA journals are always in a position to require open licenses, yet most of them do not yet take advantage of the opportunity.
 *We recommend CC-BY for all OA journals.